Sponsored Links
|
Best Art (page 1)
Practically anyone may become proficient at anything if they do it enough times. Just because a person seems to be an expert at what they do, it does not mean that what they are doing is effective for anyone else, including you. As with everything else in life, research and check out any martial art, martial art organization, martial art master, martial art school, or martial art instructor before you commit your time and money, and possibly your future wellbeing. The one you chose first will probably be the one to which you will commit yourself and stay with your entire martial art career, so —be careful in making your choice.If you want to know which movie to go see, ask people what is the worst movie they have seen recently. If you ask, “What movie is the best one to see?” you will get varying reviews based more upon the persons’ personalities, personal preferences, and emotional statuses at the time they saw the movie than upon a true assessment of the movie. However, if you ask what bad movies they have seen recently, you will find that there is an almost universal agreement as to what is a bad movie. When it comes to assessing most anything, people may not know what is good, but they most always know what is bad. In 1964, Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart tried to explain what is obscene, by saying, "I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it . . . " [Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1964)]. Basically, he was saying “I cannot define obscene but I know what it is when I see it.” The same applies to the martial arts. If you ask people “What is the best martial art?” they will usually think the best martial art is the one in which they are involved. However, if you ask “Which martial arts are bad?” you will usually get a more accurate answer. A person may know nothing about tennis and may never have seen it played, but after watching a group of players play tennis, the person will be able to separate the good players from the bad. Anyone with a basic understanding of science, physics, anatomy, physiology, etc. who uses logic and reason and does not let emotions, friendships, loyalty to instructors, etc. interfere with his or her thinking will be able to discern what martial arts are good and which are frauds. Sometimes the truth hurts. Sometimes, when you step back and objectively analyze your own art, you find it is completely wrong. The Japanese terms Budo (martial way) and Bujutsu. (martial science) are differing ways to view a martial art. Martial art styles based in the martial way focus more on the development of moral character. In contrast, martial art styles based in martial science focus on the functional value of an art as a method of combat. It is difficult to sell the parents of a prospective student on the claim that their child will be learning one of the most effective scientific fighting methods in the world. However, is easy to sell them on premise that the child will be learning "self-discipline," "self-confidence," "courtesy," etc. as well as getting lots of exercise. Many people say Taekwondo is just a sport and is useless on the street. They say that the best self-defense style is grappling, as popularized in Brazilian Jujitsu seen in Ultimate Fighting Championship matches. Other mixed martial arts claim to be the best for the street. But is there one "best" art for the street. For the sake of this discussion, "street" refers self-defense situations that common people may have face on the street, not street fighting or other supposedly no-holds-barred (NHB) fighting. In NHB fighting, there are written rules that help prevent serious injury, such as no eye gouging, biting, or weapons. In street fighting, there are also rules, unwritten, but still strictly enforced. Street fighters like to street fight, so they have to have rules to prevent serious injury so they may keep street fighting. So is grappling the best self-defense style for the street?
Karate and its Korean counterpart, Taekwondo, were developed as a civil system of fighting. They were never intended to be used on a battlefield or in competition. In their truest forms, they did not include ground fighting. Patterns contain locks, arm bars, chokes, etc. but no ground fighting. Why? Was it a mistake, or was it intentional? When the civilians designed the original techniques, the techniques were for use against violent and unprovoked attacks. There were no sparring competition techniques and, since there were no attackers that were planning to grapple with you, ground fighting was not needed. In a self-defense situation, you goal is not to win, but to safely protect yourself and escape. Most modern ground fighting techniques were derived from competition fights. Even Judo, which was designed as a sport, did not originally have ground fighting techniques. In 1882, Jigero Kano founded Judo. It was based upon the Tenshin-Shinyo-ryu and Kito-ryu systems of Jujitsu that were well known for their striking techniques and throws. These were battlefield arts that were designed by samurais who would probably be decapitated by another opponent if they remained on the ground very long while on the battlefield. In 1900, Kano arranged a competition against a Fusen-ryu-Jujitsu school. In a strategy developed to confuse the Judo fighters, the Fusen-ryu fighters fell to the floor when the matches started. The confused Judo fighters joined them on the floor and were quickly overcome by the locks and chokes of the Fusen-ryu fighters, bringing the first losses for the Judo fighters in eight years. To help regain Judo's superiority in competition, Kano added ground fighting.
© 2000 by TKDTutorage - All Rights Reserved - Email TKDTutor TaeTaekwon-do, Tae Kwon Do, TKD, Taekwondo,
|
Site Links
|